69 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
69 lines
3.3 KiB
Markdown
# Validation Report
|
||
|
||
**Document:** c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/docs/epic-1-context.md
|
||
**Checklist:** c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/.bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/epic-tech-context/checklist.md
|
||
**Date:** 2025-11-12
|
||
|
||
## Summary
|
||
- Overall: 2/11 passed (18%)
|
||
- Partial: 8/11
|
||
- Fail: 1/11
|
||
|
||
## Section Results
|
||
|
||
### Tech Spec Checklist
|
||
Pass Rate: 2/11 (18%)
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Overview clearly ties to PRD goals
|
||
Evidence: Dokumen fokus pada konteks teknis (lines 2–5) tanpa menyebutkan tujuan PRD secara eksplisit; keterkaitan implisit melalui rujukan frontend di bagian Contract Principle (lines 39–46).
|
||
|
||
✓ PASS Scope explicitly lists in-scope and out-of-scope
|
||
Evidence: "## Lingkup Teknis" (lines 9–15) memuat in-scope; out-of-scope dinyatakan eksplisit: "Tanpa perubahan UI/DB produksi (non-implementasi)" (line 15).
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Design lists all services/modules with responsibilities
|
||
Evidence: Area API (lines 27–33) dan Model Konseptual (lines 17–25) mengindikasikan layanan & entitas namun belum menjabarkan tanggung jawab tiap modul/servis.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Data models include entities, fields, and relationships
|
||
Evidence: Model Konseptual (lines 17–25) mencantumkan entitas dan fields; relasi disebut implisit di Dependencies (lines 37–38) namun belum ada pemetaan hubungan lengkap.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL APIs/interfaces are specified with methods and schemas
|
||
Evidence: Area API (lines 27–33) mencantumkan endpoint namun belum ada skema/method detail.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL NFRs: performance, security, reliability, observability addressed
|
||
Evidence: Acceptance Gates (lines 34–36) menyebut privacy, rate limiting, akses kontrol; performa, reliability, observability belum dibahas eksplisit.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Dependencies/integrations enumerated with versions where known
|
||
Evidence: Dependencies (lines 37–38) mencantumkan sinkronisasi data & konsistensi relasi tanpa versi.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Acceptance criteria are atomic and testable
|
||
Evidence: Acceptance Gates (lines 34–36) adalah kondisi persetujuan, belum AC atomik/testable per fitur.
|
||
|
||
✗ FAIL Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests
|
||
Evidence: Tidak ada matriks traceability yang mengaitkan AC ke spesifikasi, komponen, dan tes.
|
||
|
||
✓ PASS Risks/assumptions/questions listed with mitigation/next steps
|
||
Evidence: "## Risiko & Mitigasi" (lines 40–43) memuat risiko dan mitigasi.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Test strategy covers all ACs and critical paths
|
||
Evidence: Tidak ada strategi pengujian per AC; hanya menyiratkan kontrak dan prinsip; perlu pemetaan jalur kritis.
|
||
|
||
## Failed Items
|
||
- Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests
|
||
Recommendation: Tambahkan matriks traceability yang menghubungkan setiap AC ke bagian spesifikasi, komponen (file/kelas), dan kasus uji.
|
||
|
||
## Partial Items
|
||
- Lengkapi desain layanan/modul dengan tanggung jawab.
|
||
- Tambahkan pemetaan relasi antar entitas (ERD singkat).
|
||
- Spesifikasikan skema/method API.
|
||
- Tambahkan NFR performa, reliability, observability.
|
||
- Cantumkan versi dependency/integrasi.
|
||
- Uraikan AC yang atomik dan testable per fitur.
|
||
- Susun test strategy yang memetakan AC dan jalur kritis.
|
||
|
||
## Recommendations
|
||
1. Must Fix:
|
||
- Matriks traceability AC → Spec → Components → Tests.
|
||
2. Should Improve:
|
||
- Tambah ERD/relasi; perluas spesifikasi API; NFR lengkap; versi dependency.
|
||
3. Consider:
|
||
- Tautkan eksplisit ke tujuan PRD di Overview untuk menguatkan konteks. |