68 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
68 lines
3.0 KiB
Markdown
# Validation Report
|
||
|
||
**Document:** c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/docs/retrospectives/epic-2-retrospective-2025-11-12.md
|
||
**Checklist:** c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/.bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/epic-tech-context/checklist.md
|
||
**Date:** 2025-11-12
|
||
|
||
## Summary
|
||
- Overall: 2/11 passed (18%)
|
||
- Partial: 7/11
|
||
- Fail: 1/11
|
||
- N/A: 1/11
|
||
|
||
## Section Results
|
||
|
||
### Tech Spec Checklist
|
||
Pass Rate: 2/11 (18%)
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Overview clearly ties to PRD goals
|
||
Evidence: Ringkasan (lines 7–12) menautkan ke OpenAPI dan kebutuhan UI, tidak menyebut PRD eksplisit.
|
||
|
||
✓ PASS Scope explicitly lists in-scope and out-of-scope
|
||
Evidence: "## Cakupan yang Diimplementasikan" (lines 14–22) dan "## Tindak Lanjut (Tanpa Implementasi Langsung)" (lines 54–61) memisahkan apa yang sudah diimplementasikan vs belum.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Design lists all services/modules with responsibilities
|
||
Evidence: Dokumen fokus pada endpoint dan hasil; desain modul/servis dan tanggung jawab tidak lengkap.
|
||
|
||
➖ N/A Data models include entities, fields, and relationships
|
||
Reason: Retrospektif tidak bertujuan mendeskripsikan model data; referensi skema ada di OpenAPI.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL APIs/interfaces are specified with methods and schemas
|
||
Evidence: Endpoint disebut (lines 14–22) namun skema/method detail ada di OpenAPI; tidak diulang di dokumen.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL NFRs: performance, security, reliability, observability addressed
|
||
Evidence: "## Kualitas & Metrik" (lines 29–36) dan "## Risiko & Mitigasi" (lines 46–53) menyentuh kualitas, auth, rate-limit; reliability/observability disebut sebagai tindak lanjut (lines 58–61).
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Dependencies/integrations enumerated with versions where known
|
||
Evidence: Integrasi SMTP/QA disebut implisit; tidak ada daftar dependency versi.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Acceptance criteria are atomic and testable
|
||
Evidence: Menyebut suite test lulus (lines 29–32) namun tidak memetakan AC atomik/testable.
|
||
|
||
✗ FAIL Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests
|
||
Evidence: Tidak ada matriks traceability.
|
||
|
||
✓ PASS Risks/assumptions/questions listed with mitigation/next steps
|
||
Evidence: "## Risiko & Mitigasi" (lines 46–53) jelas dengan mitigasi.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Test strategy covers all ACs and critical paths
|
||
Evidence: Ada hasil test dan rekomendasi CI, namun tidak ada pemetaan ke AC dan jalur kritis.
|
||
|
||
## Failed Items
|
||
- Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests
|
||
Recommendation: Tambahkan matriks traceability AC → Spec → Components → Tests.
|
||
|
||
## Partial Items
|
||
- Perkuat keterkaitan ke PRD di Overview.
|
||
- Tambahkan ringkasan NFR reliability/observability yang lebih eksplisit.
|
||
- Daftar dependency/integrasi dengan versi yang diketahui.
|
||
- Susun AC atomik/testable dan pemetaan ke hasil test.
|
||
- Tambahkan highlight jalur kritis dan cakupan test terkait.
|
||
|
||
## Recommendations
|
||
1. Must Fix:
|
||
- Matriks traceability AC → Spec → Components → Tests.
|
||
2. Should Improve:
|
||
- NFR reliability/observability ringkas; dependency versi; AC atomik; pemetaan test.
|
||
3. Consider:
|
||
- Tautan eksplisit ke tujuan PRD agar benang merah kuat. |