LMS-BGN/docs/validation-report-epic-2-context-2025-11-12.md

Validation Report

Document: c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/docs/epic-2-context.md Checklist: c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/.bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/epic-tech-context/checklist.md Date: 2025-11-12

Summary

• Overall: 1/11 passed (9%)
• Partial: 9/11
• Fail: 1/11

Section Results

Tech Spec Checklist

Pass Rate: 1/11 (9%)

⚠ PARTIAL Overview clearly ties to PRD goals Evidence: Fokus pada konteks teknis (lines 2–5) tanpa menyebutkan tujuan PRD eksplisit; keterkaitan implisit melalui rujukan komponen UI (lines 41–47).

⚠ PARTIAL Scope explicitly lists in-scope and out-of-scope Evidence: "## Lingkup Teknis" (lines 9–15) menjelaskan in-scope; out-of-scope tidak dijabarkan eksplisit selain status non-implementasi.

⚠ PARTIAL Design lists all services/modules with responsibilities Evidence: Model Konseptual (lines 17–25) menguraikan entitas, tetapi tidak memetakan tanggung jawab modul/servis.

⚠ PARTIAL Data models include entities, fields, and relationships Evidence: Outline data (lines 17–25) ada; relasi tidak dijelaskan rinci.

⚠ PARTIAL APIs/interfaces are specified with methods and schemas Evidence: Area API (lines 27–31) mencantumkan endpoint; tidak ada skema/method detail.

⚠ PARTIAL NFRs: performance, security, reliability, observability addressed Evidence: Acceptance Gates (lines 33–36) memuat akses kontrol, throttling/logging; performa, reliability, observability tidak eksplisit.

⚠ PARTIAL Dependencies/integrations enumerated with versions where known Evidence: Dependencies (lines 37–39) menyebut bank soal & integrasi PDF tanpa versi.

⚠ PARTIAL Acceptance criteria are atomic and testable Evidence: Acceptance Gates (lines 33–36) adalah kondisi persetujuan, belum AC atomik/testable per fitur.

✗ FAIL Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests Evidence: Tidak ada matriks traceability.

✓ PASS Risks/assumptions/questions listed with mitigation/next steps Evidence: "## Risiko & Mitigasi" (lines 40–42) memuat risiko dan mitigasi.

⚠ PARTIAL Test strategy covers all ACs and critical paths Evidence: Tidak ada strategi pengujian terpetakan ke seluruh AC dan jalur kritis.

Failed Items

• Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests Recommendation: Tambahkan matriks traceability AC → Spec → Components → Tests.

Partial Items

• Tambahkan out-of-scope eksplisit.
• Lengkapi tanggung jawab modul/servis.
• Detailkan relasi data (ERD/teks).
• Spesifikasikan skema/method API.
• Tambahkan NFR performa, reliability, observability.
• Cantumkan versi dependency/integrasi.
• Susun AC yang atomik/testable per fitur.
• Peta test strategy ke AC dan jalur kritis.

Recommendations

1. Must Fix:
   • Matriks traceability AC → Spec → Components → Tests.
2. Should Improve:
   • Out-of-scope eksplisit; detail data/API; NFR lengkap; versi dependency.
3. Consider:
   • Tautkan eksplisit ke tujuan PRD di Overview untuk memperkuat konteks.