70 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
70 lines
2.9 KiB
Markdown
# Validation Report
|
||
|
||
**Document:** c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/docs/epic-2-context.md
|
||
**Checklist:** c:/laragon/www/LMS-BGN/.bmad/bmm/workflows/4-implementation/epic-tech-context/checklist.md
|
||
**Date:** 2025-11-12
|
||
|
||
## Summary
|
||
- Overall: 1/11 passed (9%)
|
||
- Partial: 9/11
|
||
- Fail: 1/11
|
||
|
||
## Section Results
|
||
|
||
### Tech Spec Checklist
|
||
Pass Rate: 1/11 (9%)
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Overview clearly ties to PRD goals
|
||
Evidence: Fokus pada konteks teknis (lines 2–5) tanpa menyebutkan tujuan PRD eksplisit; keterkaitan implisit melalui rujukan komponen UI (lines 41–47).
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Scope explicitly lists in-scope and out-of-scope
|
||
Evidence: "## Lingkup Teknis" (lines 9–15) menjelaskan in-scope; out-of-scope tidak dijabarkan eksplisit selain status non-implementasi.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Design lists all services/modules with responsibilities
|
||
Evidence: Model Konseptual (lines 17–25) menguraikan entitas, tetapi tidak memetakan tanggung jawab modul/servis.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Data models include entities, fields, and relationships
|
||
Evidence: Outline data (lines 17–25) ada; relasi tidak dijelaskan rinci.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL APIs/interfaces are specified with methods and schemas
|
||
Evidence: Area API (lines 27–31) mencantumkan endpoint; tidak ada skema/method detail.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL NFRs: performance, security, reliability, observability addressed
|
||
Evidence: Acceptance Gates (lines 33–36) memuat akses kontrol, throttling/logging; performa, reliability, observability tidak eksplisit.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Dependencies/integrations enumerated with versions where known
|
||
Evidence: Dependencies (lines 37–39) menyebut bank soal & integrasi PDF tanpa versi.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Acceptance criteria are atomic and testable
|
||
Evidence: Acceptance Gates (lines 33–36) adalah kondisi persetujuan, belum AC atomik/testable per fitur.
|
||
|
||
✗ FAIL Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests
|
||
Evidence: Tidak ada matriks traceability.
|
||
|
||
✓ PASS Risks/assumptions/questions listed with mitigation/next steps
|
||
Evidence: "## Risiko & Mitigasi" (lines 40–42) memuat risiko dan mitigasi.
|
||
|
||
⚠ PARTIAL Test strategy covers all ACs and critical paths
|
||
Evidence: Tidak ada strategi pengujian terpetakan ke seluruh AC dan jalur kritis.
|
||
|
||
## Failed Items
|
||
- Traceability maps AC → Spec → Components → Tests
|
||
Recommendation: Tambahkan matriks traceability AC → Spec → Components → Tests.
|
||
|
||
## Partial Items
|
||
- Tambahkan out-of-scope eksplisit.
|
||
- Lengkapi tanggung jawab modul/servis.
|
||
- Detailkan relasi data (ERD/teks).
|
||
- Spesifikasikan skema/method API.
|
||
- Tambahkan NFR performa, reliability, observability.
|
||
- Cantumkan versi dependency/integrasi.
|
||
- Susun AC yang atomik/testable per fitur.
|
||
- Peta test strategy ke AC dan jalur kritis.
|
||
|
||
## Recommendations
|
||
1. Must Fix:
|
||
- Matriks traceability AC → Spec → Components → Tests.
|
||
2. Should Improve:
|
||
- Out-of-scope eksplisit; detail data/API; NFR lengkap; versi dependency.
|
||
3. Consider:
|
||
- Tautkan eksplisit ke tujuan PRD di Overview untuk memperkuat konteks. |